On 05/09/2012 09:14 AM, Tom Eastep wrote: > At the time that TPROXY was implemented in Shorewall, the Squid TPROXY > documentation did not include the advice about DIVERT. As I wasn't > running Squid3 at that time (and still don't), the code was tested only > to the extent that it generated the same rules that the Squid > documentation provided > > The current thread on this list with the subject "Shorewall, TPROXY, > Transparent Squid and Multiples ISP" just brought this problem to my > attention. Shorewall 4.5.3 will support a DIVERT action in the tcrules > file to create the DIVERT chain and branch to it using the "-m socket' > match.
This is proving to require a more extensive change than I'm willing to make at this point in the 4.5.3 release cycle. So I'm going to defer the TPROXY rework until 4.5.4. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
