-------- Original Message --------
> From: "Tom Eastep" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 8:39 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Multi isp lsm question
>
> On 5/14/12 8:10 PM, Mike Lander wrote:
> > Sounds like I am doing exactly what John is implementing. Using 4.5.3.
So I
> > thought I would try these patches.
> > But I get this when running patch
> >
> > Gate:~ # patch /usr/share/shorewall/Shorewall/Providers < STATUS.patch
> > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
> > patching file /usr/share/shorewall/Shorewall/Providers
> > Hunk #1 FAILED at 881.
> > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> > /usr/share/shorewall/Shorewall/Providers.rej
> > Gate:~ # patch /usr/share/shorewall/Shorewall/Providers < STATUS.patch
> > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
> > patching file /usr/share/shorewall/Shorewall/Providers
> > Hunk #1 FAILED at 881.
> > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> > /usr/share/shorewall/Shorewall/Providers.rej
> >
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Wait until later in the week then, when I release 4.5.3.1.
>
> -Tom
> --
Awesome,
Sounds good. I have not had a failover running with shorewall for years.
But trying a new setup on a,
10mbit by 100mbit firewall. Dont need load balancing with that. This setup
is simular to yours,
with the exception of no public servers. Hence, use comcast for all traffic
else use failover.
Good to hear from you been awhile.
Thank you,
Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
