On 06/09/2012 07:45 AM, Aaron St. Pierre wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> I setup a one-to-one nat. Or at least that is what I think I did:
>
> [root@w1-atl shorewall]# more nat
> #
> # Shorewall version 4 - Nat File
> #
> # For information about entries in this file, type "man shorewall-nat"
> #
> # For additional information, see http://shorewall.net/NAT.htm
> #
> ###############################################################################
> #EXTERNAL INTERFACE INTERNAL ALL LOCAL
> # INTERFACES
> 64.22.y.y eth0:1 192.168.x.x no no
That means that no rule of the form
XXX net $FW:66.22.y.y ...
will ever match.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
