On 10/05/2012 10:10 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> Any luck?
>
> FWIW, I just installed Ubuntu 12.04 on a two-interface VM. A second VM
> host connected to the virtualized internal network can access the
> Internet through the first VM without an issue. I have Shorewall version
> 4.4.26.1 on the Ubuntu box with a minimally-modified two-interface
> Sample configuration.
Hi Nathan,
I just took another look at the dump you posted and I notice that you
are getting a very significant error rate on eth0:
2: eth0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 576 qdisc mq state DOWN
qlen 1000
link/ether 00:50:45:5d:4e:50 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
RX: bytes packets errors dropped overrun mcast
5018753 32017 2319 3 0 23
TX: bytes packets errors dropped carrier collsns
961625 10154 0 0 0 0
I wonder if your problem might be related to these errors (such as small
packets get passed okay but large ones generating errors).
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users