Tom,
  When I disable the following from rtrules:

        eth0                    -                       CABLE           1000

everything works as expected.  But when I enable (uncomment), none of the DNATs 
work.  I have this commented out for now but I must be missing something in the 
docs.  I did get the conntrack utility installed but I need a little guidance 
on usage.

Vernon


-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Eastep [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 5:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] multi-isp

On 04/18/2013 02:18 PM, Vernon Fort wrote:
> I had this working and updated the kernel and shorewall to the latest 
> version.  The DNATS no longer work - specifically ActiveSync.  
> Attached is a shorewall dump.

This is very strange:

tcp      6 271447 ESTABLISHED src=192.168.1.12 dst=70.199.129.66
sport=443 dport=10653 [UNREPLIED] src=70.199.129.66 dst=63.168.72.10
sport=10653 dport=443 mark=0 secctx=null use=2

It looks as though the conntrack entries are being built backwards with the 
reply as the original direction. I have no idea what's causing that, but if you 
install the 'conntrack' utility, we might learn more.

Thanks
-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to