2014-05-14 0:15 GMT+02:00 Tom Eastep <[email protected]>:
> On 5/13/2014 2:41 PM, Lars Erik Dangvard Jensen wrote:
> > Hi Tom
> >
> > Just a quick and dirty
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/d870c1r2k7ll4dv/brouter.png
> >
> > eth1 has public IPs on the new firewall in the same range as the current
> > firewall connected to the bridge (nic eth2) on the new firewall.
>
> When you configure a bridge, the bridge itself has the ip address(es).
> The bridge ports have no IP configuration.
Yes, my quest seems a little hard to explain :-) But is it possible to have
a "mini" switch with 2 ports in the new firewall and then the current
firewall connect to that switch (bridge) with public IP addresses
configured not knowing about the new firewall, but just the layer2
switch/bridge which is connected to ISP uplink ?
Both firewalls connect to the bridge which is connected to ISP uplink, new
firewall via eth1 virtually (or internal connection in the new firewall)
and current firewall with ethX via real physical ethernet cable.
/lars
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
