On 9/30/2014 3:27 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Hello. Using Shorewall6 4.5.5.3 (Debian) and having the firewall > config files in /tmp/shorewall6/ I get: 'ERROR: Missing Action > File (/tmp/shorewall6/action.DropSmurfs)'. But I did not ask for > any smurf actions to be taken. > > This is a very simple test firewall. Interfaces has no options > declared. > > And I removed the action from SMURF_DISPOSITION= in > shorewall6.conf > > Also, on this Debian system, the action.DropSmurfs file is only > in the shorewall /usr/share directory, not shorewall6. Although > I did not ask for any smurf action anyways. > > In the Shorewall6 4.5.21.10 upstream source package the DropSmurfs > action is set as 'noinline'. Does that mean that the workings are now > internal to Shorewall ? Also, 4.5.21.10 does not have any > action.DropSmurfs file.
Sounds like your CONFIG_PATH setting for Shorewall6 doesn't include /usr/share/shorewall. It must if you want things to work correctly. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
