On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 05:34:00PM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: > > What possible reason would there have been to develop the -lite products > if they depended on the full products on the same system? The -lite > products depend on Shorewall Core only. > Lorenzo originally packaged the -lite products as he was the package maintainer at the time. I was incorrect when I said "I packaged" as Lorenzo made the first few changelog entries.
I'm not sure about his rationale for the dependencies. I know for certain that the packages as far back as 5 years ago (4.4.1) weren't using the install.sh installer since I had migrated from Lorenzo's packages which used some custom .install files in the debian/ directory to get the files where they needed to be. His shorewall package did the same, and so I imagine that he just followed the same pattern. I did update the package at some point to take advantage of install.sh, but the issue of a dependency on shorewall-core never came up. Do I need to have the -lite packages depend on shorewall-core? I am surprised that no bug reports have every been reported on this issue. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
