On 10/5/2014 5:27 PM, [email protected] wrote: > On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:47:52 -0700, > Tom Eastep <[email protected]> wrote : > >> On 10/2/2014 5:30 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >>> Although by its nature IPv6 renders nat obsolete, it seems that in >>> practice many small setups prefers to use NAT instead of an extended >>> (seemingly too complicated) IPv6 proper configuration. I was told >>> that a recent ip6tables now supports NAT. If this is true, will >>> there be also IPv6 NAT support in Shorewall ? > >> The support is already there. > > Thee is a masq/static NAT config file for IPv6, but no NAT cfg file as > per IPv4 counterpart. Please explain of what IPv6 NAT consists - > thanks !
All support is enabled in the code. The nat file and manpages are still missing. My only interest in IPv6 nat is for failover in multi-ISP configurations; that only requires MASQ/SNAT. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
