Jean-Marc Liotier <[email protected]> wrote:

> So, if I don't misunderstand, all the IPv6 packets ultimately end up as 
> a a single sub-tree of whichever class the IPv4 protocol 41 packet is 
> classified in. Hmmm... Not what I want... But I guess that it is a 
> structural limitation of having IPv6 going through its own interface.

AIUI that's correct.

I wonder if it's possible to route traffic via an IFB (a virtual interface) 
before the IP6 traffic goes into the tunnel (after it comes out of the tunnel 
for inbound traffic). Adds complication and restrictions, but might allow 
combined TC processing for IP4 and Ip6 together.




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to