On 8/19/2015 4:02 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> I'm running shorewall 4.6.11.1 on Fedora 22 as a master for a router
> running shorewall-lite.  I'm doing transparent proxying per 
> http://shorewall.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html#Local.
> 
> I have a providers entry of:
> 
> Squid 3       0x400   -               br-lan          10.75.22.247    
> loose,notrack
> 
> And a mangle entry of:
> 
> MARK(0x400):P br-lan:!10.75.22.3,10.75.22.247 0.0.0.0/0       tcp     80
> MARK(0x400):P br-guest:!10.75.22.3,10.75.22.247 0.0.0.0/0     tcp     80
> 
...
> But I end up with a tcpre (and ~excl0 and ~excl1) looking like:

> in the tcpre table should not be there, right?
> 
> Also, I notice that transparent proxying adds a route to the main
> routing table such as:
> 
> 10.75.22.247 dev br-lan  scope link  src 10.75.22.253
> 
> I'm curious why that is needed.
> 
> But also, I notice that if you change the providers entry to a
> different IP address and then do a "shorewall reload" the above routing
> table entry for the old IP address is not removed from the main routing
> table.

Hi Brian,

Please send me a tarball of your configuration.

Thanks,
-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to