On 9/12/2015 4:01 PM, Ob Noxious wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Tom Eastep <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     Please forward the output of 'shorewall dump' collected as described at
>     http://www.shorewall.org/support.htm#Guidelines.
> 
> 
> Sorry for the late reply, I've been drowning with work lately.
> 
> Please find the "shorewall dump" attached.
> 
> The IP addresses in the dump file will be different from the earlier
> discussion because it was a test bed and the dump come from a real life
> service. It runs happily in production because this minor bug (5 DROP
> hits in FORWARD whenever the proxy or SMTP LXC service tries to get out)
> is harmless, it only fills up the logs :-)
> 
> I've disabled in "rules" the unecessary rules to make the dump less
> cluttered. Shorewall was restarted and inside the proxy LXC container, a
> simple "nc -z www.shorewall.net <http://www.shorewall.net> 80" was
> issued to trigger the hits.
> 
> To make more room for zones and log tags, the prefix "Shorewall" was
> reduced to "Swall".
> 
> If you need more information, don't hesitate to ask. Thank you very much
> for trying to help with the case.

It looks to me as if either the bridge is mis-behaving or the traffic is
being sent with the broadcast L2 address.

Please 'tcpdump -nbi vbridge' and ping as before.

Thanks,
-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to