On 04/17/2016 06:35 PM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 04/17/2016 06:43 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 04/15/2016 05:22 PM, Tom Eastep wrote:
>>> On 04/12/2016 09:36 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>> hi,
>>>> i see now shorewall supports docker and i read the docs:
>>>> http://shorewall.net/Docker.html
>>>> after i install it and compare the generated iptable rules and the
>>>> differences:
>>>> - shorewall create more rules then what docker itself add does really
>>>> all rules required?
>>>>
>>>> - after i stop docker use the shorewall generated rules and start again
>>>> docker it's add one more rule (so probably others are enough to use
>>>> docker). but this rule shouldn't have to be added by shorewall?
>>>> -A FORWARD -o docker0 -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
>>>
>>> The reason that Shorewall generates that rule is to handle *Shorewall*
>>> restart.
>>
>> the above rule was generated by docker not shorewall what's more this
>> rule not generated at all by shorewall ie this is the plus rule relative
>> to shorewall.
> 
> So you are suggesting that Shorewall show generate that rule when it
> [re]starts?

i only said these are the rules generated by docker on my system. and
these rules different form the shorewall generated rules.

-- 
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to