On 10/7/2016 6:14 AM, Norman Henderson wrote:
> Hi, I have two systems running 5.0.12 on Ubuntu, one is 14.04 LTS the
> other 16.04 LTS (which includes systemd). Both also run lsm.
>
> Due to systemd, the behavior of "service lsm status" is different on the
> 16.04 system - it does not return the actual link status only the
> service status. It would be nice to know how to get actual status
> information from lsm itself. But that's not the main issue.
>
> On the 16.04 system, shorewall status -i does not return any interface
> information, I suspect because /var/lib/shorewall/{interfacename}.status
> files do not exist. I tried creating them manually but they were deleted
> again on restart. Stop/start didn't help.
>
> How should I proceed, to get those status files created and maintained?
> And, not really a question for here, but how to get status from lsm when
> systemd insists on grabbing the service command?
> On the 16.04 system, are the interfaces defined as 'optional'? -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
