On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 10:25 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: > On 11/09/2016 08:29 AM, Tom Eastep wrote: > > > > > > > You *always* need SNAT on a router that can direct traffic to one > > provider or another.
That seems a pity. It doesn't seem unreasonable that an RA could include direction on how to choose a route/source address when more than one is present. > Multi-hop routes are still not working quite correctly in > iproute2/kernel :-( They are adding multiple routes with all but the > last one specifying a metric. So multiple 'balance' or 'fallback' > providers still aren't working as expected in Shorewall6. So what's the solution here? Just don't use balance or fallback at all? I tried removing all of those and I don't think I see any difference in my routing rules/tables than before. Maybe I should ask as this point, what should it look like, so that I have a point of reference. Cheers, b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
