On 3/15/2017 10:02 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 03/15/2017 06:28 PM, Ryan Joiner wrote:
>>> Ahh, I do see that and that would definitely be a problem.
>>>
>>> What's odd though is I copied and pasted it from the sample file
>>> and I'm pretty sure it was not incorrect.  Maybe that is the
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> I just left the office and will check this out first thing in the
>>> morning.  Maybe it's an issue with the CentOS RPM or I'm just a
>>> moron. The latter has a higher probability. :0
>>>
>>
>> Unfortunately, there is a typo in the two-interface snat sample -- the
>> three-interface file is correct.
>
> Sorry, I remember how the typo came in but didn't report it :(
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
>

Oh ok.  So, full disclosure on both this CentOS6 machine and the CentOS 
7 one I had done a few days ago, I did manually type in:

MASQUERADE      192.168.0.0/16          eth0

and it still didn't work.  That is when I went to go try the sample file 
just in case I was completely blind and not seeing what I was doing wrong.

Either way I will make the correction, and then report back and provide 
a dump.

Thanks everyone!

Cheers,
Ryan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to