Mark Morgan Lloyd <markmll....@telemetry.co.uk> wrote: >> Not too sure about the 50:50 split - never done it that way. But I think the >> way to do it will be to define both providers with the balance option, and >> set at the same priority. > > The problem there is that the balance facility- if I understand it correctly- > works at the level of TCP sessions. What I need is something that kicks stuff > around on a per-packet basis, i.e. if an e.g. SMTP session sends 1000 packets > half go out over one interface and half over the other.
Probably correct. I'm not sure yuo can do it on a packet by packet basis with two separate interfaces. Combining the two tunnels into a bonded port would do that - but I don't know enough about it to know if you can do that without support from the other end. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
