I haven't had that problem in quite a while.  Don't really remember how I fixed 
it.

How do you define your IPSEC endpoint in zones:
siteA                     ipsec mss=1376
gives an iptables entry in 'Chain lan4_frwd':
    0     0 lan4-siteA   all  --  * ccast   0.0.0.0/0            
192.168.64.0/23      policy match dir out pol ipsec
(ccast is internet interface).  So if the policy is not IPSEC it falls thru to 
the
other rules.

Bill

On 10/13/2017 11:55 AM, Dorian Kind wrote:
Bill,

great idea to use shorewall-hosts, thanks for the inspiration!

There's still the issue of packets addressed to $ipsec_net leaving the
external interface unencrypted when the IPsec SA isn't present, if I
understand correctly.

Best regards,
Dorian

On 13 October 2017 at 12:21, Bill Shirley
<[email protected]> wrote:
Here's what I use:

/etc/shorewall/params:
lan4_net=192.168.4.0/24
wifi_net=192.168.6.0/24
local_net=$lan4_net,$wifi_net
RFC1918=10.0.0.0/8,172.16.0.0/12,192.168.0.0/16

zones:
# all RFC 1918 that we're not using
r1918                   ipv4

hosts:
r1918 $LAN4_IF:$RFC1918!$local_net,$ipsec_net,$ovpn_net
r1918   $WIFI_IF:$RFC1918!$local_net,$ipsec_net,$ovpn_net
inet    $INET1_IF:!$RFC1918
inet    $INET2_IF:!$RFC1918

policy:
r1918   fw              REJECT  notice
lan4    r1918           REJECT  info
r1918   lan4            REJECT  notice
wifi    r1918           REJECT  notice
r1918   wifi            REJECT  notice
r1918   inet            DROP    warning

Bill

On 10/13/2017 4:53 AM, Dorian Kind wrote:
Hi all,

I'm a happy shorewall user since 2009 and never had an issue that I
couldn't solve using the excellent documentation. There's just one thing
that always bugged me. We have a couple of tunnels to branch offices, for
which shorewall inserts the appropriate iptables rules (webr being the local
zone, while the *pn zones are connected over IPsec tunnels):

Chain webr_frwd (1 references)
  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source       destination
[...]
  759K  121M webr2gvapn  all  --  *      eth-ext1 0.0.0.0/0
<http://0.0.0.0/0> 10.50.0.0/16 <http://10.50.0.0/16>         policy match
dir out pol ipsec
6660K 4097M webr2swlpn  all  --  *      eth-ext1 0.0.0.0/0
<http://0.0.0.0/0> 10.60.0.0/16 <http://10.60.0.0/16>         policy match
dir out pol ipsec
   18M   66G webr2fnopn  all  --  *      eth-ext1 0.0.0.0/0
<http://0.0.0.0/0> 10.70.0.0/16 <http://10.70.0.0/16>         policy match
dir out pol ipsec
4961K 6804M webr2hyppn  all  --  *      eth-ext1 0.0.0.0/0
<http://0.0.0.0/0> 10.80.0.0/16 <http://10.80.0.0/16>         policy match
dir out pol ipsec
99227  134M webr2rwvpn  all  --  *      eth-ext1 0.0.0.0/0
<http://0.0.0.0/0> 10.100.0.0/16 <http://10.100.0.0/16>        policy match
dir out pol ipsec

However, in order to prevent local traffic from leaking out when the IPsec
SA can't be established for some reason, I use a script to insert the
following two rules after shorewall has generated its ruleset--because per
policy, local (webr) traffic to the internet is allowed:

iptables -I OUTPUT -d 10.0.0.0/8 <http://10.0.0.0/8> --out-interface
eth-ext1 -m policy --pol none --dir out -j REJECT --reject-with
icmp-admin-prohibited
iptables -I FORWARD -d 10.0.0.0/8 <http://10.0.0.0/8> --out-interface
eth-ext1 -m policy --pol none --dir out -j REJECT --reject-with
icmp-admin-prohibited

I would really like to integrate these rules into the shorewall
configuration, but can't figure out any way to do it. From what I can tell,
shorewall-rules does not have policy match options.

Is there a canonical way to prevent RFC1918-addressed, non IPsec encrypted
packets from leaving the FW on an external interface?

Thanks and best regards,
Dorian



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot


_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to