FTP is always "special"  ... :-)

For many years I have configured FTP like other protocols:

DNAT    net     dmz:192.168.109.71 tcp     20,21,25,80,443    -      A.B.C.D

Where A.B.C.D is an alias public IP (eth0:N)
192.168.109.71 is the server internal IP

It has worked fine except for same clients that had some coonections problems, but playing with attive/passive mode in the client usually they can connect and work.
Now there are some clients that aren't able to use FTP with this servers.
I noticied this also from one on my boxes that is under a double or triple NAT:

# ftp SERVER.com
Connected to SERVER.com.
220 FTP Server ready.
Name (SERVER.com:root): user-ftp
331 Password required for user-ftp
Password:
230 User user-ftp logged in
Remote system type is UNIX.
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp> debug
Debugging on (debug=1).
ftp> ls
---> PORT 192,168,111,107,196,255
200 PORT command successful
---> LIST
425 Unable to build data connection: Connection timed out



# ftp SERVER.com
Connected to SERVER.com.
220 FTP Server ready.
Name (SERVER.com:root): user-ftp
331 Password required for user-ftp
Password:
230 User user-ftp logged in
Remote system type is UNIX.
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp> passive
Passive mode on.
ftp> dir
227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,109,71,178,174).
ftp: connect: Connection timed out
ftp> bye
421 Idle timeout (600 seconds): closing control connection


# ftp metalluxlight.com
Connected to SERVER.com.
220 FTP Server ready.
Name (SERVER.com:root): user-ftp
331 Password required for user-ftp
Password:
230 User user-ftp logged in
Remote system type is UNIX.
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp> passive
Passive mode on.
ftp> passive
Passive mode off.
ftp> dir
200 PORT command successful
425 Unable to build data connection: Connection timed out


If I try from another client box (very similar to the previous), I got:

# ftp SERVER.com
Connected to SERVER.com.
220 FTP Server ready.
Name (SERVER.com:root): user-ftp
331 Password required for user-ftp
Password:
230 User user-ftp logged in
Remote system type is UNIX.
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp> dir
200 PORT command successful
150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for file list
-rw-r--r--   1 user-ftp user      5500719 Mar 14  2017 CompanyProfile.pdf
-rw-r--r--   1 user-ftp user          390 Nov  9  2015 LEGGIMI.txt
drwxr-xr-x   3 root     root         4096 Jul  4 13:51 cataloghi
-rw-r--r--   1 user-ftp user           53 Dec 29  2015 
google0f8da78f93df36d9.html
 . . .
-rw-r--r--   1 user-ftp user         3353 Oct  7  2016 wp-load.php
-rw-r--r--   1 user-ftp user        34057 Oct  7  2016 wp-login.php
-rw-r--r--   1 user-ftp user         7993 Jan 11  2017 wp-mail.php
-rw-r--r--   1 user-ftp user        13920 Oct  7  2016 wp-settings.php
-rw-r--r--   1 user-ftp user        29890 Oct  7  2016 wp-signup.php
-rw-r--r--   1 user-ftp user         4035 Nov  9  2015 wp-trackback.php
-rw-r--r--   1 user-ftp user         3064 Oct  7  2016 xmlrpc.php
226 Transfer complete

This works without problem and is under a double NAT (different connection).


Also tried the syntax (in the firewall obviously):

FTP(DNAT)    net     dmz:192.168.109.71 tcp      -   -    A.B.C.D

# uname -a
Linux srv-gw 4.4.49-1-pve #1 SMP PVE 4.4.49-86 (Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:39:20 
+0200) x86_64 GNU/Linux

# shorewall version
4.6.4.3

Debian 8.7


ip_set                 45056  2 ip_set_hash_ip,xt_set
ip_set_hash_ip         32768  0
iptable_filter         16384  4
iptable_mangle         16384  1
iptable_nat            16384  1
iptable_raw            16384  0
ip_tables              28672  4 
iptable_filter,iptable_mangle,iptable_nat,iptable_raw
ipt_ah                 16384  0
ipt_CLUSTERIP          16384  0
ipt_ECN                16384  0
ipt_MASQUERADE         16384  0
ipt_REJECT             16384  8
ipt_rpfilter           16384  0
 . . .
nf_conntrack 106496 34 nf_nat_ftp,nf_nat_irc,nf_nat_sip,nf_nat_amanda,xt_CT,nf_nat_snmp_basic,nf_conntrack_netbios_ns,nf_conntrack_proto_gre,xt_helper,nf_conntrack_proto_udplite,nf_nat,xt_state,xt_connlimit,nf_nat_h323,nf_nat_ipv4,nf_nat_pptp,nf_nat_tftp,xt_conntrack,nf_conntrack_amanda,nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4,ipt_CLUSTERIP,nf_conntrack_proto_sctp,nf_conntrack_netlink,nf_conntrack_broadcast,xt_connmark,nf_conntrack_ftp,nf_conntrack_irc,nf_conntrack_sip,nf_conntrack_h323,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_conntrack_pptp,nf_conntrack_sane,nf_conntrack_snmp,nf_conntrack_tftp
nf_conntrack_amanda    16384  1 nf_nat_amanda
nf_conntrack_broadcast    16384  2 nf_conntrack_netbios_ns,nf_conntrack_snmp
nf_conntrack_ftp       20480  1 nf_nat_ftp
nf_conntrack_h323      77824  1 nf_nat_h323
nf_conntrack_ipv4      16384  108
nf_conntrack_irc       16384  1 nf_nat_irc
nf_conntrack_netbios_ns    16384  0
nf_conntrack_netlink    36864  0
nf_conntrack_pptp      20480  1 nf_nat_pptp
nf_conntrack_proto_gre    16384  1 nf_conntrack_pptp
nf_conntrack_proto_sctp    20480  0
nf_conntrack_proto_udplite    16384  0
nf_conntrack_sane      16384  0
nf_conntrack_sip       28672  1 nf_nat_sip
nf_conntrack_snmp      16384  1 nf_nat_snmp_basic
nf_conntrack_tftp      16384  1 nf_nat_tftp
nf_defrag_ipv4         16384  2 xt_TPROXY,nf_conntrack_ipv4
nf_defrag_ipv6         36864  1 xt_TPROXY
nf_log_common          16384  1 nf_log_ipv4
nf_log_ipv4            16384  13
nf_nat                 24576  11 
nf_nat_ftp,nf_nat_irc,nf_nat_sip,nf_nat_amanda,nf_nat_proto_gre,nf_nat_h323,nf_nat_ipv4,nf_nat_pptp,nf_nat_tftp,xt_nat,nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4
nf_nat_amanda          16384  0
nf_nat_ftp             16384  0
nf_nat_h323            20480  0
nf_nat_ipv4            16384  1 iptable_nat
nf_nat_irc             16384  0
nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4    16384  1 ipt_MASQUERADE
nf_nat_pptp            16384  0
nf_nat_proto_gre       16384  1 nf_nat_pptp
nf_nat_sip             20480  0
nf_nat_snmp_basic      20480  0
nf_nat_tftp            16384  0

What am I missing?

I don't think it matters, but the natted FTP server is a CentOS 7.x with ProFTPd.

--

Thanks,
                         Paolo

____________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to