On Tue, 2018-06-19 at 09:39 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: > > It is in 5.2.0
Hrm. I had to patch /usr/share/shorewall/action.IfEvent by hand with
5.2.0.
> Does your distro install the common Shorewall files in
> a directory other than /usr/share/shorewall/?
I don't believe so, no:
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/shorewall/action.IfEvent
shorewall-5.2.0-0.01.fc28.noarch
> Does 'shorewall show
> actions' list IfEvent?
$ sudo shorewall show actions | grep IfEvent
IfEvent noinline # Perform an action based
on an event
Here's what's in the tarball I downloaded:
$ md5sum shorewall-5.2.0.tar.bz2
64197788451a266d542f0af17fa9da12 shorewall-5.2.0.tar.bz2
$ tar xOjvf shorewall-5.2.0.tar.bz2 shorewall-5.2.0/Actions/action.IfEvent |
sed -ne '135,141p'
#
# if the event is armed, remove it and perform the action
#
perl_action_helper( $action , "-m mark --mark $mark/$mark -m recent
--remove --name $event" );
} elsif ( $command & $UPDATE_CMD ) {
perl_action_helper( $action, "-m recent --update ${duration}--hitcount
$hitcount --name $event $srcdst" );
} else {
Which looks to me like the unpatched version, or am I mistaken?
I'd do some git archaeology to see when this patch went in but it seems
SF's git-web interface is pretty immature in that respect. Github's
"Blame" functionality would tell the story.
Speaking of git, you have 3 merge requests open on Shorewall, FWIW.
Some have been there quite a while.
Cheers,
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
