August 21, 2019 1:53 PM, "J Cliff Armstrong via Shorewall-users"
<shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> August 19, 2019 5:50 PM, "J Cliff Armstrong via Shorewall-users"
> <shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> 
>> August 19, 2019 4:47 PM, "Tom Eastep" <teas...@shorewall.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 8/19/19 2:26 AM, J Cliff Armstrong via Shorewall-users wrote:
>> 
>> Running Arch Linux kernel 5.2.8-arch1-1-ARCH, Shorewall installed from Arch 
>> community repo.
>> 
>> I'm trying to configure the policy:
>>> lan wan NFQUEUE(0:1)
>> 
>> The goal being to utilize two instances of snort (for blocking outgoing 
>> sensitive information, in
>> this case) running on separate cores and let netfilter balance connections 
>> between them as per the
>> shorewall-policy manpage provided with the arch package and currently 
>> available on shorewall.net.
>> "NFQUEUE" passes 'check'. "NFQUEUE(0)" passes 'check'. "NFQUEUE(0:1)" fails 
>> 'check' with the error:
>>> Checking /etc/shorewall/policy...
>>> ERROR: Invalid policy (NFQUEUE(0) /etc/shorewall/policy (line 15)
>> 
>> Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the documented syntax? Additionally, is the 
>> syntax really different
>> from the NFQUEUE action in the shorewall-rules? I'm hoping "no" but, of 
>> course, the documentation
>> says it is.
>>> It's a bug. Patch attached.
>>> 
>>> -Tom
>>> 
>>> PS: I assume that your version is 5.2.3... There is no version 5.2.8.
>>> --
>>> Tom Eastep \ Q: What do you get when you cross a mobster with
>>> Shoreline, \ an international standard?
>>> Washington, USA \ A: Someone who makes you an offer you can't
>>> http://shorewall.org \ understand
>>> \_______________________________________________
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Shorewall-users mailing list
>>> Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
>> 
>> Hey, thanks Tom. I appreciate it. I had just pulled the latest source from 
>> git after actually
>> taking a look at the code in my local copy. My knowledge of Perl is 2 
>> decades out of date so I
>> wasn't sure if what I thought I saw was really there.
>> 
>> Thanks again!
>> 
>> Regards,
>> J Cliff Armstrong
>> 
>> P.S. Correct. My Shorewall version is 5.2.3.3. My Kernel version is 5.2.8 
>> w/Arch distro patches
>> applied. Sorry if I was unclear. Next time(?) I'll put the version info for 
>> Shorewall in the body
>> instead of the subject.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Shorewall-users mailing list
>> Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
> 
> Hmm, looks like something similar is happening with macros (should this be a 
> new thread?). With the
> following rules in `/etc/shorewall/rules`:
> 
>> BitTorrent32(DNAT-) wan lan:10.5.1.1
>> BitTorrent32(NFQUEUE(0:1c,bypass)) wan lan:10.5.1.1
> 
> I get the following when running `-v2 check`:
> 
>> ..Expanding Macro /usr/share/shorewall/macro.BitTorrent...
>> ERROR: Invalid ACTION (PARAM:1c,bypass))) 
>> /usr/share/shorewall/macro.BitTorrent (line 12)
>> from /etc/shorewall/rules (line 40)
> 
> What I'm trying to do is create a DNAT rule using an explicit NFQUEUE instead 
> of an implicit
> ACCEPT. The plan is to implement this as a custom action or macro to simplify 
> the management of
> rules.
> 
> Unfortunately, `trace compile` is pretty unhelpful in this case... ending 
> without an error (and
> thus no line number for the problematic code). Else I'd have worked up a pull 
> request with a fix.
> 
> Trace attached.
> 
> Regards,
> J Cliff Armstrong
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Shorewall-users mailing list
> Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Apologies, I somehow managed to save and gzip the output of `shorewall -v2 
compile` and attach that to my last message instead of `shorewall trace 
compile`. *Actual* (verified) trace attached to this message, not the previous.

It also appears this trace *does* have line numbers for the error... I'll poke 
at it while I wait for a response.

Regards,
J Cliff Armstrong

Attachment: shorewall_trace.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to