-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 2/28/20 1:07 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 16:28 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote: >> > > I wonder if there is any thought or comment on my proposals below? > >> Would it be infeasible to just leave the mangle table alone if >> there is no Shorewall configuration that needs to use it? >> >> Or alternatively, a shorewall.conf option? >> >> Personally I like the former, but the latter is most certainly a >> step up from mangling (NPI -- OK, maybe kinda) the capabilities >> file after it's created. >
In 5.2.4, we'll add an option in shorewall[6].conf to preserve the mangle table. - -Tom - -- Tom Eastep \ Q: What do you get when you cross a mobster Shoreline, \ with an international standard? Washington, USA \ A: Someone who makes you an offer you http://shorewall.org \ can't understand \________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEFNMNR63CLO6yqbL8luaz8kI6TRAFAl5a6dwACgkQluaz8kI6 TRCm/g/+O1OSPiD5l8klmc+XkmMMtXSF3AVkFSeTUw2IEcF8ThllC8ZahVLkjXIG Ikgb/JzHYZ5+30BZ6OJgaFVHbAxNGixTzdQyIIFTJpJOZnZYVZXhbSVmfdj/F5wH OfjPAhXSc53r+y9/h82kg29DLKe9+IWJtH72pj3IYSzIAqfN/BhmVbGeWrS1SKci Babi8g6FOvo2zAgOJmIsiPkLhLXb8UpmPG8zKyCKWEudOd2dtagOAMsldqewksoq HUNUMRTPkRXAMXhVVjNjj0ScJxIQrWVaUNQW6JOya9WgdbUeirvpgIHyahNsxKYp fkmy4LMP5nK1WJyszkxNmByqIFlGFgjWlux715uR3Gx5MOusxJniJDXouqf1n8Fv msVpo74Ed4qtXawYCB98+ThlPM4sL/WE1lgreJiF3FU3y19B4MK3IyH1xmnUCiQu /7icD+zvGZePIcVtqwGdNuEIvK8Zt/4TlpfZ2ZlKjdptYUWKXen/MSbie90sJD3j Yqj56KuoYknszUOgbSzWPhu1plnG/VG4AUINnftLS6SA5MpTRhq+rMhgiV9d2J5e jwIPGyIjlnja1SEkg1730F/tGxLmW84J9jYwe8lFjWZHMHfwxZBDWzAc3lU/D5nT UzAwgjGp5w4iAVKLw7GoYo7gq7XFNH5GcwSxElUbMwdrcnhxzc4= =E7XT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
