Sounds like you want to use Shorewall's multi-ISP facility
(https://shorewall.org/MultiISP.html). Make tun0 the 'primary' provider
and eth0 the 'fallback' provider.

-Tom
_______________________________________________

I think I was looking at that document earlier.  I am not currently
running shorewall on the RPi.  I will go back over the documentation and
see if I can apply it to my situation.

I may have to post a picture somewhere, to make the infrastructure clearer.


Is the VPN endpoint on the RPi? I understood it to be on the Shorewall Box.

-Tom

Yes. The RPi is providing a wireless access point whose internet connection is through VPN, hence providing VPN access to wifi devices (so the RPi has a wifi interface and an eth0 interface -- physically, and a tun0 interface through OpenVPN which ultimately goes through the eth0 interface which is connected to shorewall box via LAN network). So no VPN on the shorewall server.

I wanted to provide wireless devices the capability of having VPN access if the device does not natively support it (think IoT devices). Which all works fine. With the problem being inbound internet from shorewall box being forwarded to RPi on LAN (RPi eth0; tcpdump showing that working); but then return traffic instead of going through eth0 back to shorewall box, out to internet, the return traffic goes out tun0 interface on the RPi, which is not correct path for that particular traffic. Besides being the wifi access point, I want the RPi to also act as a web server accessible via the outside internet.

I want all traffic that originates on RPi wifi to go out tun0 (which is does today), but Internet traffic coming from shorewall box and entering RPi eth0 to go back that same path (like it does if I do not have a rule on the RPi server to send traffic through VPN tun0).

I know how to get the RPi to act as web server to the internet, or how to have the RPi be a wireless access point who creates VPN tunnel for connected wifi devices, but I have not figured out to have the RPi do both things at the same time.

Sorry for being so confusing, and this certainly not being a critical issue. I found one article on the interwebs of someone trying to do the exact same thing, but it was a thread that did not have a solved conclusion.

Thank You.


_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to