On 12/15/20 1:04 AM, Vieri Di Paola wrote:
> I don't know if this can help, but the SOC VM admin is claiming that
> only ARP traffic is seen there when there should also be plenty of
> TCP/UDP traffic.
> 
> So I've increased shorewall logging and noticed that some packets are
> being rejected. The SOC VM is a ssh and http server, but I cannot
> access these ports from $FW.
> 
> kernel: Shorewall:OUTPUT:ACCEPT:IN= OUT=soc.50 SRC=192.168.245.1
> DST=192.168.245.2 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=56827 DF
> PROTO=TCP SPT=36702 DPT=22 WINDOW=64240 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
> kernel: Shorewall:INPUT:REJECT:IN=soc.50 OUT=
> MAC=ac:1f:6b:f5:b7:1a:00:50:56:92:76:e5:08:00 SRC=192.168.245.2
> DST=192.168.245.1 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=TCP
> SPT=22 DPT=36702 WINDOW=14480 RES=0x00 ACK SYN URGP=0
> 
> Here's the SW dump while trying to connect via ssh and http from
> 192.168.245.1 (FW) to 192.168.245.2 (soc50):
> 
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qCtaE9VNG_qzD-_uZltWZjwun4_I61vf/view?usp=sharing
> 
> What am I missing?
> 


You haven't defined soc.50 to Shorewall, so it is rejecting all IPv4
traffic to/from that interface.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ Q: What do you get when you cross a mobster
Shoreline,         \    with an international standard?
Washington, USA     \ A: Someone who makes you an offer you
http://shorewall.org \    can't understand
                      \________________________________________

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to