On Do, 2016-09-29 at 12:43 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote: > On 2016-09-29 12:24 PM, Pat Suwalski wrote: > > > > Indeed, the current solution is best for that, though it breaks a > > bit > > when used with RAW+JPEG, as I prefer to. When deleting a RAW+JPEG > > file, > > you get leftover _shotwell_1.jpg, _shotwell_2.jpg, _shotwell_3.jpg > > files, which is rather odd. > > I should clarify, these are zero-byte files that get created during > theĀ > delete.
Er... o.O Can you please provide a shotwell.log from running shotwell with SHOTWELL_LOG=1 while that happens? Thank you. _______________________________________________ shotwell-list mailing list shotwell-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/shotwell-list