On Do, 2016-09-29 at 12:43 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> On 2016-09-29 12:24 PM, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> > 
> > Indeed, the current solution is best for that, though it breaks a
> > bit
> > when used with RAW+JPEG, as I prefer to. When deleting a RAW+JPEG
> > file,
> > you get leftover _shotwell_1.jpg, _shotwell_2.jpg, _shotwell_3.jpg
> > files, which is rather odd.
> 
> I should clarify, these are zero-byte files that get created during
> theĀ 
> delete.

Er... o.O Can you please provide a shotwell.log from running shotwell
with SHOTWELL_LOG=1 while that happens? Thank you.

_______________________________________________
shotwell-list mailing list
shotwell-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/shotwell-list

Reply via email to