Hey On Dec 9, 2016 9:58 PM, "Jens Georg" <m...@jensge.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 21:05 +0100, Jens Georg wrote: > > > Patch: > https://github.com/abrauchli/shotwell/commit/f9222a979385a40988730713 > bc7a9caf96b2cef4 > > I'm not quite sure whether it also affects RAW file duplicates that > were discussed lately as I'm not familiar with the workflow for > RAW-type files. > > > The other patch is related to the earlier phase of checking the > contents of the camera. Your change affect the duplicate check during > the actual import. > > > > Let me know if that's mergable. > > > I'd say so for now. > > On a second thought - using the file md5 will take the meta-data into > account, the thumbnail md5 won't.
I'm not at my pc right now, but are you sure it's not just the pixmap data? There's also a metadata_md5 if memory serves me right. Also, IMO if the metadata differs on import it's not really a duplicate. If you merge them you'll loose one set of metadata.. Unless we can store them both, but current code doesn't account for that AFAIK. > _______________________________________________ > shotwell-list mailing list > shotwell-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/shotwell-list
_______________________________________________ shotwell-list mailing list shotwell-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/shotwell-list
