On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 01:57:54PM +0200, Peter DO Smith wrote: > Yes, that would be advantageous, though, speaking as a developer, I think it > is much easier to work with the sqlite3 database. Its structure is easily > deduced by inspection.
True, although it's also subject to change. On my system, VersionTable currently contains schemaVersion = 8. That does suggest another option though: I could write a small script which scans the sqlite3 database, moves photos into the %YYYY%/%EVENT%/ location, and updates the database as it does so. > My point being that each person has their own way of physically > organising their files and Shotwell respects this. Indeed, but the flipside is that Shotwell itself won't assist me in physically organising new photos. That is, once Shotwell has imported the files (as you say, it only does YYYY/MM/DD at the moment), then I can't use Shotwell to reorganise them into my preferred structure. So then that means I need to import my photos externally to Shotwell, and organise them into directories externally to Shotwell, and then tell Shotwell to scan those directories. If I'm doing all that outside of Shotwell, then I might as well just use gthumb to view them. > One of the features I would like to see is the ability to drag a photo from > Shotwell and drop it into the email I am composing. Gmail (which I use) > already has a drag and drop interface for attachments but sadly I cannot > access it from Shotwell. I use mutt, so such drag-and-drop might be more problematic :-) Cheers, Brian. _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
