A couple of clarifications: The Shotwell PPA currently contains Shotwell 0.8 for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick), but only Shotwell 0.7 for Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid). We plan to update the PPA within the next week to include Shotwell 0.8 for Lucid as well.
I fully expect that Ubuntu will include Shotwell 0.8 in Natty within the next couple of weeks. We're planning to release Shotwell 0.9 in March, and our plan is for 0.9 to be included in the final releases of both Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty) and Fedora 15. adam On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:32 PM, David Velazquez < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, I bet the Ubuntu packagers will pick up 0.8 before Natty makes it out > the doors. In case they don't though there's always the Shotwell PPA that > can be used to keep up to date with Shotwell versions as they're released > between Ubuntu releases. The PPA is > here<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyorba/+archive/ppa> and > while it doesn't look like they've updated to 0.8 yet I'm sure it will be > done when the team returns back from their break/vacation. > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Levente Torok <[email protected]>wrote: > >> In this case I suggest pushing ver 0.8 to ubuntu packagers,if you know a >> way >> to do it. >> I believe it would be useful for all.thanks Lev >> >> iPhone-ról küldve >> >> On 2010.12.27., at 14:47, Adam Dingle <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Lev, >> >> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Levente Torok <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > It was the standard ubuntu 10.10 shotwell 7v2. >> > I upgraded to 0.8 according to your web site and the problem seems to go >> > away. >> > >> >> That's great to hear. >> >> >> > Formerly I used the version that was bundled with ubuntu 10.04 ( 0v5 >> > as according to packages.ubuntu.com ). >> > In the meantime I renamed the home directory of the current user (from >> > /home/lev3 -> sg.else). >> > Could it cause this curruption? >> > >> >> Hard to say, but maybe there was a bug in 0.7 which caused a startup >> problem >> after a rename like this. >> >> >> > Are you eager to solve this issue, or you concentrate on new trunk >> instead? >> > >> >> Since everything is working for you in 0.8, I don't think we need to >> investigate the problem more now. If there was a bug here, it looks like >> it's been fixed in 0.8. Cheers - >> >> adam >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> > > _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
