that's what I thought I had: sudo add-apt-repository ppa:yorba/ppa sudo apt-get update sudo aptitude safe-upgrade
ah I see my error now: I'm not on maverick on this machine, I'm on lucid: $ sudo aptitude show shotwell Package: shotwell New: yes State: installed Automatically installed: no Version: 0.7.2-1~lucid1 Priority: optional Section: gnome Maintainer: Jim Nelson <[email protected]> hey .... that's YOU! :) Ok, I guess I'm awaiting a backport then :) or awaiting 11.04, which ever comes first. thanks for the tip. On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Jim Nelson <[email protected]> wrote: > There was a lot of work between 0.7.2 and 0.8.0 dealing with fixing > duplicate detection. I can't speak for an 0.8.1 deb, but the Yorba PPA has > the latest and greatest for Maverick: > > https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/ppa > > -- Jim > > > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Gary Lawrence Murphy > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> sure thing: >> >> http://img839.imageshack.us/i/shotwelldups.jpg/ >> >> The version I have was downloaded just this morning from the website, but >> it is only 0.7.2; is there a .deb for 0.8.x anywhere? (if possible I'd >> rather stay with the ppa etc as it saves having to restructure things >> further down the road when the distro catches up) >> >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Jim Nelson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Gary, >>> >>> The screenshot didn't come through the mailing list. Can you post a link >>> to it perhaps? >>> >>> Also, what version of Shotwell are you running? We had some bugs in the >>> duplicate detection that were fixed in 0.8.0. (The current version is >>> 0.8.1.) >>> >>> -- Jim >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Gary Lawrence Murphy < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I have only just installed shotwell from the website into Ubuntu 10.04 >>>> >>>> The attached screenshot pretty much captures it: the test for duplicate >>>> photos appears to be far too naive as we can see the dialog rejecting >>>> images >>>> as duplicates where in the sidebar the images are clearly unique >>>> >>>> or am I merely misunderstanding the meaning of 'duplicate'? the dialog >>>> also >>>> might want to say what files it believes are the originals. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Have Blog, Will Travel: blog.teledyn.com* >>>> *A Serviceable Substitute: post.teledyn.com* >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Shotwell mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Have Blog, Will Travel: blog.teledyn.com* >> *A Serviceable Substitute: post.teledyn.com* >> >> > -- *Have Blog, Will Travel: blog.teledyn.com* *A Serviceable Substitute: post.teledyn.com* _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
