My vote goes to the free form option.
Regards, Cor Op 24 jan. 2011 22:01 schreef "Eric Gregory" <[email protected]> het volgende: > Hi everyone, > > We're working on an often-requested new feature, a user configurable > directory structure, and would like community feedback on how this would > best suit your needs. > > This feature allows you to set a directory structure for your photos instead > of being forced to use Shotwell's default. > > For now, we're wondering if we want to support hard-coded options only, for > example, we might have the following options: > YYYY/MM/DD > YYYY/MM-DD > YYYY/MM > YYYY_MM_DD > > Perhaps there's others you'd like to see? > > Another option is to support a free-form entry with date formatting > characters to make your own directory structure. For example, you might > type in something like > %Y%/%M%/%D% > to achieve the current directory structure. > > Additionally, we're looking to add a feature where you can assign a name to > your import. This could also be added to the directory structure. > > If you're interested in this feature, let us know what you'd like to see and > which aspects are most important to you. > > - Eric > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
