[email protected] wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Antony Mee <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I had a similar thought - my use case simply being a multi-user system >> when >> the whole family can use a common library and switch users 'safely'. >> (What >> to do about the photos you don't want the kids to see?!) > > What about *sensible* photos you want to manage but you don't want anybody > to browse them if they just open shotwell on your machine? (e.g. the > family > computer case). > Two *easy-to-do* options (I guess) would be : > > - adding a special tag feature (let's say "sensible" with a beautiful > locker or warning icon) that requires the sudo password (or whatever > for > Windows) each time you want to browse them (or even better, just one > time > for each instance of shotwell). > - a "Show sensible photos" checkbox in the Edition menu (unchecked at > startup) that requires the sudo password for each instance of shotwell > if > you check it. > >
As per this other thread [http://shotwell.3510.www.nabble.com/Shotwell-Shotwell-0-7-plan-tp16487p16487.html] I totally agree with the «sensible» or «hidden» tag feature. Out of the client/server scenario I think it would not be necessary to force a password on the tag, though. My idea is more about quickly hiding sensible photos from a slideshow (e.g. a screensaver) or from being directly displayed in the thumbnail view. Ciao ciao, Piergi -- View this message in context: http://shotwell.3510.www.nabble.com/Shotwell-GSoC-2011-tp33500p36160.html Sent from the Shotwell mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
