Hi Josep,
this is a reasonable idea - I've ticketed it at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4489 .
You should know, however, that we're thinking about storing thumbnails
in photo directories themselves at some point:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/2250
With this approach, we'd create a .thumbnail directory in each photo
directory and store thumbnails there. At that point there would be no
need for a directory tree as you propose. Cheers -
adam
On 12/15/2011 01:54 PM, Josep Cols wrote:
Hello:
Shotwell saves the thumbs in a flat directory.
I propouse create a directory tree for thumbs to improve scalability.
For instance:
For the firsts 16K photos, a flat directory can be used
For the next photos, 1 new directory, in the main directory, can be
created to acomodate another 16K thumbs
Whit this schema, and the same actual name schema, it is not needed to
save the full path for every thumb because it can be computed from te
file name.
Regards
_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
