Hi Izidor,
Thanks for your kind words. No, no one is assigned to that ticket
yet. If you'd like to take a crack it, that would be great!
Right now, our plugin architecture wouldn't allow for something like
this to be implemented. You would need to add this to the core of
Shotwell.
In addition to our wiki pages for contributors, I would read over the
ticket closely and see what's being asked for. Before coding up a
patch, I suggest adding to the ticket a comment that explains what
you'd like to do (in essence, a proposal) and make sure we're on board.
Others may want to comment as well. That way you're not running one
direction when we're expecting something different.
I hope that clears things up!
-- Jim
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Izidor Matušov
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
first of all I would like to say thank you for such an awesome app as
Shotwell! All of my photos are managed exclusively by Shotwell
only... and I am concerned what could happen when my
~/.local/share/shotwell goes corrupt. There is already a feature
request:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3549
I would like to ask about the state of the request. Are any of
developers going to work on it in the close future? If not, I would
like to work on a patch for it and contribute it to the project.
I have already started reading wiki for new contributors. However,
there is not so much about creating a specification for a feature. I
mean something like if it will be included in core feature set or
should be implemented as a plugin. Is it let on the patch author to
decide and later convince others? Is brainstorming and creating a
spec on the mailing list prior coding appropriate?
Thanks for the clarification!
Izidor
_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
