Hi Clint and Jim,
Thank you for your reply (see below).
To me, it seems that bug #4300 now has
been fixed in 0.14.0+trunk in today's version from
http://ppa.launchpad.net/yorba/daily-builds/ubuntu
I would like to very much thank you and everybody else who helped
resolving this!
All the best,
Ulf
-------------------------------------------------
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:34:04 -0700
Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Call for Translations: Shotwell 0.14! How about bug
#4300 ?
From: Clint Rogers <[email protected]>
To: Ulf Rehmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Jim Nelson <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Ulf,
You're absolutely right - we can reproduce this there, I just saw it -
and it appears to be a logic problem.
The main library view, as well as the event view that contains all the
thumbnails is a kind of object in the code known as a CollectionPage;
as I recall, the filters for each kind of CollectionPage can be set
individually. It looks as if, in this case, not showing 'rejecteds'
simply isn't being propagated from the library CollectionPage (having
the search/filter bar present also applies the filter, which explains
why it behaves the way it does when you press F8).
Thank you for alerting us to this; I'll reopen the ticket in question
right away, and we'll work on getting this fixed.
Thanks again,
-c
On 19/03/2013, Ulf Rehmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> I have installed shotwell 0.14 (on Ubuntu 12.10). It works well so far
> for me: thanks to everybody who helps developing this great system!
>
> However, it seems that bug #4300 is only partially fixed.
>
> If shotwell starts with no searchbar activated, then under "Library",
> the rejected pages are not displayed, as they should.
>
> However, if one opens an event collection or a tagged collection
> containing rejected pages these are displayed, but they should not.
>
> Pressing F8 once (or more times) for such an event or tagged collection
> will make the rejected pages dissappear, but only for that collection for
> which F8 was pressed.
>
> If shotwell is started with searchbar activated (e.g., because it before
> was closed in that state), all rejected pages are initially not
> displayed as they should. However, pressing F8 (i.e., toogling off the
> search bar) puts it into the state described above.
>
> It would be nice if this could be fixed: Rejected pages initially should
> not be shown within any collection, no matter if the search bar is on or
> off (possibly unless the system is configured otherwise, if such a
> config option is intended).
>
> Any comments?
>
> All the best,
> Ulf
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:43:14 -0008
> From: Jim Nelson <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Call for Translations: Shotwell 0.14! How about bug
> #4300 ?
> To: Ulf Rehmann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Lucas Beeler <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-m+JhXYiYK1qrbSOVxWnc"
>
>
> [1:text/plain Hide]
>
> Hi Ulf,
>
> Yes, we're hoping to have that fixed for 0.14.
>
> -- Jim
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Ulf Rehmann <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Thanks for the good news concerning 0.14!
>
> Here is a question: Will the new release contain a fix of bug #4300?
>
> See below.
>
> Best regards,
> Ulf
>
>
> -------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:19:40 -0008
> From: Jim Nelson
> Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Again: Bug #4300 Shotwell view state is incorrect at
>
> startup
> To: Ulf Rehmann
> Cc: [email protected]
> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-gPSIVqCTMVddXW/af6Tv"
>
>
> [1:text/plain Hide]
>
> Hi Ulf,
>
> I can reproduce the problem you're seeing. I've re-opened the bug for 0.14.
>
>
> -- Jim
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ulf Rehmann wrote:
>
> It seems that bug #4300 is still not fixed (or was revived).
>
> Pages rated "Rejected" are initially shown in version 13.0 as well as in
> 13.1.
>
> As far as I can tell, the code to fix this problem as mentioned on
> http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4300 is (in slightly modified version)
> contained in
> my 13.1 sources, but does not seem to work.
>
> I am working on Ubuntu 12.10.
>
> Can anybody help?
>
> Best regards
> Ulf
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Shotwell mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
>
>
> [2:text/html Show]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Shotwell mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
>
> [2:text/html Show]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Shotwell mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
>
--
---------------------------
"I don't know what (b² - 4ac) equals, and I don't care," Tom said
indiscriminately.
_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
