Hi,

On 2010-06-16, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> I'm not an expert when it comes to openbmap-logger, but it seems to me that
> what they did (hackish as it may look) they did for a reason. This doesn't
> look like a mistake. 

my guess is that fso changed the interface, and where it used to return
the number as a String, it now returns an Int32 - for which conversion
then fails. A proper patch would have to differentiate between old and
new fso, though...

Anyway, I have mailed Onen (the openbmap author), hopefully he'll find
the time to enlighten us.

Florian

_______________________________________________
Shr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel

Reply via email to