On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:49:31 +0100
> Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > 2) To get -mtune back we can set more specific DEFAULTTUNE for all
> > SHR supported devices in distro config, so that binary feed will be
> > renamed from armv7a-novfp-neon to cortexa8-novfp-neon and
> > cortexa9-novfp-neon.
> >    + "better" performance on tuna, same on nokia900, om-gta04, crespo
> >    - extra disk space needed for separate cortexa9-novfp-neon feed
> >      (armv7a-novfp-neon will be removed - replaced by
> > cortexa8-novfp-neon)
> >    - 33% longer build time for all SHR supported machines (3 package
> > archs instead of 2)
> I think that's the way to go but I've some comments on that:
>  * SHR does support tuna? I don't think it's well supported since no
>    one is working on it for SHR.

It's built on official buildhost so from this POV it's supported and it
has more atention then e.g. nokia900 and crespo..

>  * SHR hasn't got a very powerfull buildhost, so we could skip building
>    tuna on the official SHR buildhost until someone steps in and
>    supports it?

SHR buildhost is using danny branches, so not problem now. The problem
is for devs using shr or jansa/test branches and building tuna together
with other armv7a devices just because it's almost "for free" as it
reuses whole feed and sstate-cache.

>  * Openwebos supports tuna and has a powerfull buildhost. does it have
>    cortex a8 machines? the HP touchpad?

Powerfull buildhost is not yet in use and tuna is the only armv7a 
device built by webos-ports jenkins (at last now), so no problem here.

> So I think we could do 2) in a way that won't impact build a lot.

would be nice to have some benchmarks to see how much (if anything at
all) we gain by using -mtune and especially -mtune=cortexa8/a9 diff.

FWIW: I can already provide SHR images for tuna/nokia900/om-gta02 built without 
-mtune.

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Shr-devel mailing list
Shr-devel@lists.shr-project.org
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel

Reply via email to