> are you sure you added my fix? here my phonelog.db is 100k and it only
> takes ~10 seconds (first test was with a trimmed down log).
I am on shr-testing (don't know if the database structure changed in
unstable???)...can that be a reason? I am ready to switch to unstable
but non-working wifi was a deal-breaker

> Weird... Maybe try
> SELECT * FROM calls;
> in sqlite3 and see how much time it takes... if more than a milisecond,
I am not much aware of sqlite (even with SQL), anyways with .timer ON
'select * from calls;' gives
CPU Time: user 0.400000 sys 0.225000 (thats the only time measurement
I could do).
There are 262 records that are printed over Wifi, so scrolling text
took some 1.5 seconds (I guess thats useless info)

> that may be the issue ;) anyhow I'll optimize pyphonelog's queries sometime,
> hopefully tomorrow, and will try to make everything quicker... in general
> this db could use some more indexes. (not too many, but a bit more).
I can try a bit of tinkering at my end...

BTW, because I am using shr-testing, can I get phonelog (the main
python file)...so that I can update it with your latest changes

--Vikas
_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user

Reply via email to