On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Klaus 'mrmoku'
Kurzmann<[email protected]> wrote:
> I have a strong preference for something which is connman based, because
> connman will be the networking future of FSO. The only one I know of is the
AFAIK connman has some issues as does not add a route if the usb0 one
is already present.
The second problem is that it *seems* to not support advanced wpa
configuration, TTLS, TLS, LEAP, PEAP, or at least need to be enhanced.
For sure every WiFi software I tested permits only the PSK configuration.
We need some support for disabling ar6000 power management with a
"click" and a 2.6.29 patched kernel.
Just to add m2c in this brainstorming as the replacement of Mofi may
be not the real problem.
Nicola
_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
