On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Am Samstag 25 Juli 2009 20:07:44 schrieb Adam Jimerson:
> > On Saturday 25 July 2009 01:27:17 pm Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > due to a broken patch for opkg we had an opkg in our feed which behaved
> > > badly. We reverted the patch and put an updated opkg into the feed.
> > >
> > > Please all do: 'opkg update; opkg install opkg' to get it.
> > >
> > > And yes, after that opkg will still suck a lot... but not as much as
> the
> > > broken one :-)
> >
> > Taking the lesser of two evils approach?  Thank you for taking this
> action,
> > at least the old version had workarounds for its problems, but hopefully
> > the issues with opkg will eventually be fixed.
>
> yeah, we already started discussions about a complete rewrite or some other
> way to substitute it... *Unfortunately the opkg codebase seems to be such
> broken that fixing it might be more dificult than rewriting :(*
>
I can confirm this. :)

>
> --
> Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann
>

 And I also favor a rewrite, and I think that'll happen soon.

Tom.
_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user

Reply via email to