On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Warren Baird<[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
> I'd personally like to continue to see a relatively usable x-server in
> shr-unstable, at least until we have a viable shr-testing...
Theoretically when shr-testing will be freezed it will not receive
upgrades but only bug fix, so we risk to begin a cycle that will carry
Xglamo to stable, and that is not so good.
That's what I understood after a lot of discussion about shr stabilization.
In tha past shr was broken a lot of time to be bleeding edge, and
developers said to users it's "unstable" and not yet released, why a
difference on glamo?
I'd like very much if some debian experienced users may assert glamo
x11 driver works fine or less.
Of course if the stabilization process is not on the road (I may guess
shr-import push to oe-devel will take some time), and unstable has to
be "usable" things are different.
m2c
Nicola
_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
