piratebab wrote: > What a good news. I am using SHR-U for month as my pro phone, GPS, MP3 > player, web navigator, and it works very well. why not transfering it to > the stable branch ,
As far as I'm concerned, stable can be a copy of current unstable, but with this: http://www.shr-project.org/trac/ticket/562 > > Sebastian Spaeth a écrit : >> Helge Hafting wrote: >> >>>>>> The last thing we are grappling with before >>>>>> we can push out: JaMa wanted to fix version numbering so we can offer >>>>>> opkg upgrades rather than requiring reflashes (too often) in the >>>>>> >> [...] >> >>>> No, you will have to reflash this time for sure. Too much has changed >>>> and we simply don't have the resources in our unstable branch to >>>> test/implement all upgrade paths. >>>> >>> This time, sure. But no more after that, is my understanding? >>> >> No, I was not saying that we will never have to reflash again. :-) >> But JaMas changes will make the version numbering more consistent, so >> opkg recognizes updates properly as such. >> >> But it might well be that we'll have to reflash once we merge our shr >> -specific stuff into the upstream OE tree. Believe us, we don't like >> reflashing either.... >> >> We will try very hard to avoid reflashing in the more stable trees (once >> those exist :-) ) >> >> spaetz >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Shr-User mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user >> > > _______________________________________________ > Shr-User mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user _______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
