On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Paul Fertser <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Lowell Higley <[email protected]> > writes: > > So I would say that no, the device drivers will not be open > > source. I would say the developer community would be provided with > > binary kernel modules." > > I guess that would be very likely to be considered a GPL violation > then. > > I guess I should read the mailing lists more often. Food for thought, not even android is GPL. Since this thread, I have found their SDK license. I'm not a lawyer so it is thoroughly confusing to me. Some things seem to be open source and others are not. If I read their license right, their Plazma OS (which is linux based) is not open source... which to me IS a GPL violation. Again.. not a lawyer. I'm thinking of sending the license on to an acquaintance at the FSF and getting his read. If anyone is interested, I'll update here. If not, I won't.
_______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
