On 19 April 2010 21:17, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Montag, 19. April 2010 20:10:20 schrieb Joachim Ott: >> On 19 April 2010 16:06, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Am Montag, 19. April 2010 15:30:09 schrieb Joachim Ott: >> >> On 19 April 2010 14:44, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> > Am Montag, 19. April 2010 14:24:22 schrieb Joachim Ott: >> >> >> In /etc/frameworkd.conf, the ntpserver is set to 134.169.172.1, which >> >> >> is a certain host at tu-bs.de. I'd like to use pool.ntp.org instead, >> >> >> like in the old days with ntpdate. This is not a single host, but as >> >> >> the name says, a pool of ntpservers. Is there any reason not to use >> >> >> that pool? >> >> > >> >> > fsotdld uses a different one... time.microsoft.com ;) We'll change it >> >> > to the ntp.org pool instead though :-) >> >> >> >> Are there currently 2 timed running? otimed and fsotdld? >> > >> > no (would not be possibly anyway as only one of them can get the dbus >> > name org.freesmartphone.otimed). But we will switch to the new fsotdld >> > soon. >> >> I was wondering because on my unstable the fsotdld is already started >> from rc5.d. I'm removing the script manually then. > > oh shit, yes. I forgot. We already switched. It was even myself who did that > change... how could I forget :(
Then you also forgot to disable otimed in /etc/frameworkd.conf. After restarting frameworkd and fsotdld, it finally went to check one ntpserver from pool.ntp.org. Without looking at the fsotdld source: I remember that ntpdate was always checking 2 different ntpservers to find the more accurate one. Is this needed here too? _______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
