On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:04:24AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:56:33AM -0700, undrwater wrote: > > > > > > Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > > > > > > Would be great if you can prepare git patch for that, but even plain > > > files will do :). > > > > > > > > > > Here's a screenie: > > http://scap.linuxtogo.org/files/259c95cf2b3cdd9eb2dc38e43f21b1b5.png > > http://scap.linuxtogo.org/files/259c95cf2b3cdd9eb2dc38e43f21b1b5.png > > nice one! > > added in my "feed" as new default (not available yet, due to rebuild > from scratch with newer gcc-4.4.4) > > > Not sure how to do the git patch thing, so here's the text of the osd.xml: > > heh, please at least as your editor to ignore 80 chars per line rule or > attach it as file next time :). > > > <osd enabled="yes" type="text" label="${navigation.item.street_name} > > ${navigation.item[1].street_name_systematic}" > > x="0" y="0" w="480" h="30" align="0" background_color="#3e6fd2cc" > > font_size="400" /> > > Cheers,
Please try latest navit_0.1.0+svnr3266-r5.5.4_armv4t.ipk navit-icons_0.1.0+svnr3264-r1.4_all.ipk there is interesting OSD optimization from carcinoma http://navit.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/navit?view=rev&revision=3262 I used 3250 last few days on trip and found route calculation a bit less reliable then before (from static point to static point it worked probably every time, but from "fast" moving car I almost never got route with sane delay - maybe recalculating after position was moved significantly). But if you find this version better than whatever version is now in shr-u feeds, I'll update it there. Regards, -- uin:136542059 jid:[email protected] Jansa Martin sip:[email protected] JaMa _______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
