Il giorno dom, 29/08/2010 alle 11.00 +0200, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann ha scritto: > Am Samstag, 28. August 2010, 16:18:01 schrieb Davide Scaini: > > First: thanks for your reply :) > > > > Il giorno sab, 28/08/2010 alle 14.13 +0200, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann ha > > > > scritto: > > > Am Freitag, 27. August 2010, 21:52:48 schrieb Davide Scaini: > > > > Not a flame, just my opinion over last changes > > > > (improvements/regressions). If you think that my opinions are too > > > > strong I'm sorry. I appreciate the work of everyone in OSS but I think > > > > that it's necessary to discuss and share opinions to find and develop > > > > the best ideas. > > > > > > > > -(guess) kernel related things: > > > > -- no shutdown pressing button for 7-8 seconds (as it was before); i > > > > think > > > > > > > > it's necessary because somethimes freezes. > > > > > > > > -- faster than ever! just incredible! bootup and graphics are really > > > > > > > > faster. Graphis it's still unstable... some glitches after resuming > > > > from suspend. > > > > > > > > -illume2 sucks! sorry... > > > > not only aesthetically (no great differences from 1, but this wasn't > > > > what i expected/needed) > > > > > > > > i'm talking about user experience: > > > > -- switching between apps -> two touchs against one (in illume1), that > > > > to > > > > > > > > me means two times slower than before > > > > > > > > -- switching between apps -> no more apps list ... this is absolutely > > > > > > > > useful > > > > > > > > -- no more shelf gadgets like wifi/bluetooth indicators... so I have > > > > no > > > > > > > > idea when I'm connected via wifi or not... this is just crazy. (it > > > > would be great to switch on/off directly from shelf) > > > > > > > > I can't understand why there is no more possibility to select illume1 > > > > on shr (but i'm sure there's a valid reason since I blindly trust shr > > > > people) > > > > > > This is due to the fact that you can't *build* both in the same tree... > > > and old illume1 is abbandoned for more than a year I think. > > > > but afair even the next to last release there were the choice between > > shr-illume1 and shr-illume2 at first boot, now it's missing. > It *was* possible to build both. And that changed - and that's why we're left > with one of them now. > > > I know that the code is not developed anymore because Rasterman decided > > to revrite all illume code giving birth to illume2... and it's about a > > year taht illume2 is kind of birth but not growth. > > From the brilliant Raster I expected: > > - as he said a complete rewrite of the code... ok, personally I > > - great innovation in interface, some new concept... > > - awsomeness everywhere ;) (he said he had a great project with a great > > company...) > No idea, if it was raster's decision to do that... But for sure I know that > it's not raster himself doing the rewrite. The 'trick' about illume2 is that > every part is modular and can be exchanged. Just needs someone to step up and > write what we want... volunteers? ;) >
I have no idea about how efl works but, if not completely alone, I would like to learn something. If there is someone with some experience that can teach me -and hopefully to some other guy- where and how to start (find manuals, examples, setting up a buildhost... that means how to join shr people in this effeort) I would be honoured to help. d > > > > > > So either we put some effort into illume2 to fix the annoying issues or > > > we put some effort into some alternative (which you probably prefer ;). > > > > personally I think that hackable:1 stuff is great. It works. It has a > > nice pim management... but unfortunately is not as comfortable as shr > > is... maybe the integration of fso in rev6 will give the right spin to > > the project and distro. (just speculation, i prefere to talk about > > usability) > > > > > And yes, I have to agree that I'm far from being satisfied with it either > > > :/ > > > > > > > Hope this helps to discuss and improve our experience :) > > > > (and I hope to be helpful) > > > > d > > > > I stress the fact that I want to help in some way... > > d > >
signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
_______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
