-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/01/2015 12:58 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
| These may not feel like important issues to you, but for some | people they are life-or-death issues, and there really is a | tradeoff to be made between the freedom of people in that situation | to speak, and the freedom of the operators of mail servers to | surveil them, even when that surveillance has a good motive behind | it. The problem is that it's not _just_ the people who need the | information who get it. We appreciate that, but there already are plenty of special purpose infrastructures that are perfectly capable of doing what you want when you want. People who want it already have it. No reason to encourage the breakage of "good purpose surveillance" (such as spam/abuse filtering or infected machine remediation) all the time, because a very small number perhaps only occasionally needs it. It doesn't have to be either/or. It's both now. Not sure we need to rock that boat. Hence a WG to answer that question. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWXeSMAAoJENy2YTBCU1mlpPQH/3jIcTLjP7cOpHmWqegot33o eF76kxEOrO5oTfLjCZS/CfTe2mD7bcTxjaLK79JemNWkUB2U+4/cEXOhh2e+5xz7 jk9PPn4ye559Wt8NMa3SqBkd47JnDy9JROLzLZVrh+btY5+aS/405betYgnMksPN nx828n36zOXn07bl2viHyCGs1HrNDoWOrujphFYGbx/Foklmso3fBI/354zHKduY yO9LIiP6bwQeVUu3Tyo2pXTeYojNx3PIyPDTU1edOwgjeBoBpZDZjyRFk2/a3Rjo smnE4vAqHdN3vif7HzZruxF6AQSp6u4MNSO23kEyDxlHbF2VRF6tJ6aOB77lRt8= =47Il -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Shutup mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shutup
