On 12/2/2015 7:20 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: > Wednesday, Dec 2, 2015 10:12 AM Dave Crocker wrote: >> Absent hard data that shows efficacy, both of you are wrong. > > Not leaking data is 100% effective at not leaking data.
A shame that has nothing to do with this thread or what I said. >> At base, we don't know how to prevent folks from getting scammed, >> while still allowing them to interact with the outside world. > > We know that revealing their personal information is harmful. A shame that has nothing to do with this thread or what I said. >> Lots of people are sure they know the right answer here, but none >> of them can document efficacy. Worse, most of the ways people cite >> have already been demonstrated to be inadequate or unachievable. > > Redacting IP address information from SMTP submission servers is very > achievable, A shame that has nothing to do with this thread or what I said. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Shutup mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shutup
