On 12/6/2015 7:44 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > Agreed, but I don't see why you think this is an RG and not a WG.
Please re-read his note and one or another of my earlier notes. They explain why. At the moment, proposals for taking specific actions represent a random walk down a large and complex set of possibilities, with no serious analysis of benefits, risks, likelihoods or anything other than intuition. Before modifying infrastructure operations of a critical Internet resource, perhaps we should develop some credible basis for taking any specific action? Individuals are free to take whatever random path strikes their whimsy. Standards groups should have rather more basis for moving the whole ship in a particular direction. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Shutup mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/shutup
