Hi Yuri,
> >stable. Unless someone is already on the job of fixing the
> >bugs in fix 4, I would stay with fix 3.
> Sources is nearest to fix 4. And i don't want move sources back to fix 3. It's somt
>as
> error correction in fix 4.
Yes, I know sources are nearer fix 4. If you think we can fix the bugs
in fix 4, than it's OK. Personally, I've experienced too much problems
with fixpack 4, and have backed-out to fixpack 3.
> > And what do you mean by "no debugging"? Sibyl
> >IDE DOES allow integrated debugging.
> But doesn't work :- ( (fix 3 & 4)
It DOES work with recent fixpacks. I don't know about fix 4, but fix 3
is definitely working (I used it just a few minutes ago).
> > And I don't think an
> >E-MLE is anyway better than Sybil's IDE text editor.
> Better, because configurable & extensible.For example, i don't like WordStart style
>text
> editor and want CUA keys. And??? Nothing. I can't redefine keys, can't change
> selection type. Another example: I want rexx hilighting (for rexx-macros), of couse,
>
> pascal based editor doesn't allow make this and i will be use another editor.
AFAIK, Sibyl's IDE perfectly supports CUA keys. I never used
Wordstar-style keys (never got used to those). I don't know if one can
redefine keys, cause I feel good with the current keys.
Sure, the IDE doesn't offer any facility to change keysets, but I don't
know if the sources offer a good separation for the key definitions, in
which case adding support for new keysets would be easy.
> Oopps... May be you don't know about E-MLE? E-MLE is E-Multi Line Editing control.
> EPM based on them.
I DO know about E-MLE. E-MLE, as a control, might be more powerful (or,
at least, configurable), but it suffers from several limitations and
performance problems (e.g. when dealing with text greater than 64Kb).
Also, to integrate an E-MLE into the Sibyl IDE you should rewrite almost
everything, and I wouldn't waste manpower for this. Consider also that
Sibyl's IDE supports dockable toolbars, the tabbed multi-window
interface, and other goodies that wouldn't be easy to implement with an
E-MLE (E-MLE is a monolithic control: it includes the whole user
interface, including menu, status bar, etc).
I didn't look at Sibyl's IDE sources, but syntax highlighting may be
well separated from the rest, so it could be easier to add configurable
syntax highlighting (provided it's useful) than rewriting the whole
thing with an E-MLE.
This is obviously only my humble opinion.
Bye
Cris
N�����r��{*.�ǥ}���b�X��ǧv�^~�e���g��� ������j:+��ei�(� ����r��zț�W�
