-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Geoff Huston wrote: > I'm against this exact match requirement - I think its a case of > semantic overload in mixing basic authorities (permission to originate) > with routing policy (explicit nomination of what prefixes to route). Agreed.... I could see someone wanting to say: "nothing longer than /x will be advertised in this space," but I don't see any reason to make this an exact match only. :-) Russ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF5b+/ER27sUhU9OQRAkI2AKC4VTiz0fhnYhSb4hXg0a4jJMpEZQCeLikc W1WH9UiIMgr6JG9g6wxUsUM= =Og24 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
